The Ninth Circuit overturned a lower court injunction that had blocked Perplexity's Comet agent from shopping on Amazon. Amazon argued the agent was violating federal computer-hacking law; the court disagreed, ruling that it's the user — not Perplexity — who "accesses" Amazon when an agent acts on their instructions.
Jay's take: Not a green light — the court was explicit this doesn't set broad precedent. But it's the first real signal that agentic AI acting on your behalf isn't automatically illegal just because a site objects.